
tbd30 |
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control.
• obtain an understanding of the company’s internal control
relevant to our audit in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the company’s internal control.
• evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used
and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related
disclosures made by the Board of Directors and the CEO.
• conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’
and the CEO’s use of the going concern basis of accounting
in preparing the annual accounts. We also draw a
conclusion, based on the audit evidence obtained, as to
whether any material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude
that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in
the annual accounts or, if such disclosures are inadequate,
to modify our opinion about the annual accounts. Our
conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to
the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause a company to cease to continue as a
going concern.
• evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of
the annual accounts, including the disclosures, and whether
the annual accounts represent the underlying transactions
and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We must inform the Board of Directors of, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit. We must
also inform of significant audit findings during our audit,
including any significant deficiencies in internal control that
we identified.
Furthermore, we are obliged to provide the Board of Directors
with a statement confirming that we have complied with
relevant professional requirements regarding independence,
and present all relations and other circumstances that might
impact our independence and, if necessary, measures taken
to eliminate threats or implemented counter-measures.
Of the areas communicated by the Board of Directors, we
establish which have been the most significant for the audit
of the annual accounts, including the risks assessed to be the
most significant as regards material misstatements which,
therefore, comprise the key audit matters. Unless laws and
other regulations prevent us from disclosure of the matter,
these disclosures will be included in our auditor’s report.
In addition to our audit of the annual report, we have also
performed a review that the Board of Directors and the CEO
have prepared the annual report in a format that enables
uniform electronic reporting (ESEF report) pursuant to
Chapter 16, Section 4(a) of the Swedish Securities Market Act
2021 financial year.
Our review and our opinion relate only to the statutory
requirements.
In our opinion, the ESEF report has been prepared in a format
that essentially enables uniform electronic reporting.
We have performed the review in accordance with the
FAR’s recommendation RevR 18 Review of the ESEF report.
Our responsibility under this recommendation is described
in more detail in the Auditors’ responsibility section. We
are independent of tbd30 AB (publ) in accordance with
professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have
otherwise fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance
with these requirements.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
The Board of Directors and the CEO are responsible for
ensuring that the ESEF report has been prepared in accordance
with the Chapter 16, Chapter 4(a) of the Swedish Securities
controls that are deemed necessary to prepare the ESEF
report without material errors, whether due to fraud or error.
Our responsibility is to form an opinion with reasonable
certainty whether the ESEF report is in all material respects
prepared in a format that meets the requirements of Chapter
16, Section 4(a) of the Swedish Securities Market Act
RevR 18 requires us to plan and execute review procedures
to achieve reasonable assurance that the ESEF report is
prepared in a format that meets these requirements.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it
is not a guarantee that a review carried out according to
RevR 18 and generally accepted auditing standards in
Sweden will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of the ESEF report.
Quality Control) for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of
Financial Statements, and other Assurance and Related Services
Engagements and accordingly maintains a comprehensive
system of quality control, including documented policies and
procedures regarding compliance with professional ethical
requirements, professional standards and legal and regulatory
requirements.
The review involves obtaining evidence, through various
procedures, that the ESEF report has been prepared in a
format that enables uniform electronic reporting of the annual
accounts. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material